The Buffettology workbook

Curated by Brian Kim, CPA — every pick gets a plain-English summary and the key takeaways.
Brian Kim, CPA · 2.89M YouTube Subscribers →What this book actually teaches
- 01The workbook reduces the authors' method to a step-by-step worksheet: qualitative filter, financial screen, projection, and required rate of return.
- 02The qualitative filter looks for a "consumer monopoly" with durable pricing power, evidenced by consistently high return on equity.
- 03Valuation runs forward from historical earnings growth and a historical P/E to an expected compound return compared to the long bond.
- 04Mary Buffett is not an authorized Buffett source; the method is the authors' simplification, not Warren's documented process.
- 05The mechanical projection works on stable consumer franchises and badly on most other business types — and several 2001 examples have since broken down.
What's in this book
Mary Buffett and David Clark's argument is that the valuation logic outlined in their earlier book Buffettology can be reduced to a step-by-step worksheet that a non-professional investor can fill in with public-filing data. The Buffettology Workbook is structured as the exercises: chapter by chapter, the reader is walked through the calculations the authors attribute to Warren Buffett — identifying durable competitive advantages, pulling the right numbers from financial statements, projecting earnings, and converting projected earnings into an expected rate of return at today's price.
The arguments build through the worksheet itself. First, the qualitative filter: identify a "consumer monopoly" — a business with brand or structural advantages that protect long-term earnings — and rule out commodity-type businesses where pricing power is absent. Second, the financial-statement screen: durable competitive advantages should show up as consistently high return on equity, manageable debt, predictable earnings growth, and conservative accounting. Third, the valuation: estimate the company's earnings ten years out using historical growth rates and per-share metrics, apply a P/E based on history, add dividends, and compare the implied compound return to the long bond rate plus a margin. The book uses worked examples of well-known consumer franchises to show the math end-to-end. Fourth, the discipline: buy only when the expected return clears your hurdle and hold for the long pull.
The natural audience is do-it-yourself investors who liked the original Buffettology and want to actually run the spreadsheet on a specific stock rather than read about it.
The weaknesses are significant. Mary Buffett is not a Buffett insider — she was briefly married to Peter Buffett (Warren's son), divorced in 1993, and Berkshire and the family have publicly disputed her authority to speak for Warren. None of these books are authorized. The methodology described is a simplified projection of historical growth at a historical P/E — that is not how Buffett describes his own process in the shareholder letters, which lean more on owner-earnings, discount-rate logic, and qualitative judgment. The mechanical worksheet works tolerably on the kind of stable consumer franchise the examples cherry-pick, and badly on almost everything else. The 2001 examples also predate the structural shifts in retail, media, and consumer brands that have undermined several of the showcased "consumer monopolies."
Worth working through if you specifically want a beginner-level worksheet for valuing a stable, mature consumer-brand business. Anyone serious about Buffett's method should read his shareholder letters and Hagstrom's books and skip the Mary Buffett shelf.
Read next
About Mary Buffett
Read more from Mary Buffett and explore the full bibliography on ClearValue Books.
View Mary Buffett's page →Get an email if our take on The Buffettology workbook changes.
We re-review our picks. We'll email you if The Buffettology workbook's ranking or review changes — no checking back.
Ready to read The Buffettology workbook?
Buy the edition we recommend on Amazon.
Buy on Amazon →




