Suze Orman's opening gambit in Women & Money is a transfer of authority: from advisors, partners, institutions, and cultural norms that have historically managed women's money on their behalf, to the women themselves. This is not a fringe observation. Survey after survey documents that women are systematically less engaged with their own financial management than men — not because of capability, but because of socialization, deference, and a financial-services industry that has historically targeted its marketing at male heads of household.

Orman's observation has a practical edge. Financial advisors who are compensated by transaction fees or AUM percentages have interests that are not perfectly aligned with their clients. Banks structure products to maximize their margin. Insurance products are often sold, not bought, because the buyer hasn't done independent analysis. None of these parties will make the same tradeoffs a person makes when managing their own money — because it's not their money.

The implication is not that advisors are untrustworthy, but that delegation without understanding is risky. A person who doesn't understand the basics of their own financial life cannot evaluate whether the advice they're receiving is good. They can't ask the right questions, push back on inappropriate recommendations, or recognize when a product serves the advisor's interests better than their own.

For the book's target audience — women who have ceded financial control to partners, advisors, or circumstance — this sentence is a call to engagement. The rest of Orman's book is the practical manual for what that engagement looks like.

Keep reading.